MARLEENA M HALL, Employee
PRIME CARE HEALTH PLAN, Employer
An administrative law judge (ALJ) for the Division of Unemployment Insurance of the Department of Workforce Development issued a decision in this matter, finding that the employee did not quit but was discharged, her discharge was not for misconduct connected with her employment and the employee was eligible for benefits, if otherwise qualified.
Although the decision was in the employee's favor, the employee filed a petition for commission review. No petition for review was filed by the employer. Wisconsin Statute § 108.09 (6)(d) provides:
(d) In any case before the commission for action under this subsection, the commission may affirm, reverse, modify or set aside the decision on the basis of the evidence previously submitted, may order the taking of additional evidence as to such matters as it may direct, or it may remand the matter to the department for further proceedings
Given that the decision was in the employee's favor, the commission summarily affirms the decision of the administrative law judge. Accordingly, the employee is eligible for benefits as of week 4 of 2012, if otherwise qualified.
Dated and mailed June 29, 2012
BY THE COMMISSION:
/s/ Robert Glaser, Chairperson
/s/ Ann L. Crump, Commissioner
/s/ Laurie R. McCallum, Commissioner
hallmar : 150 : 9
cc:
Robert A. Eckhardt
[ Search UC Decisions ] - [ UC Digest - Main Index ] - [ UC Legal Resources ] - [ LIRC Home Page ]
uploaded 2012/08/13